Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 09:25
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 819
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389
Gigabyte(1458 37B1) ≥ 4GB; Aorus Extreme 8G
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 167
Parallax 166
147% 171 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 149
Splatting 107
116% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 631 297 292 285 278 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,977
Write 1,465
Mixed 1,089
SusWrite 341
270% 1,218 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 65.5
221% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 481
DQ Mixed 686
500% 660 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 197%
Great: 280%
Intenso Sata III 127GB
117GB free
Firmware: N1126F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 265 266 265 266 265 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 445
Write 251
Mixed 274
SusWrite 265
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 36.2
122% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 179
151% 221 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
136GB free
Firmware: SD03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 61 62 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 57.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 61.6
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 38%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
596GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 98
Write 51.7
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 104
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 63%
Fujitsu MHV2120BH PL 120GB
7GB free
Firmware: 892C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 36 37 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 32.7
Write 31.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 37.2
23% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 22%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
298GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 83.8
Write 83.2
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 84.1
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 202 200 202 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 159
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 202
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 205 206 204 205 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 157
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 205
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 161 160 159 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 161
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$84
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 37
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 22.6
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $718
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback