Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560 659 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 68.2 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 153 58% 100 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 541 51% 424 Pts	64-Core 757 47% 757 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 75%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82E6) ≥ 4GB; nVidia GP104 [GeForce GTX 1070] OEM CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.9% Very good	Lighting 95.3 Reflection 105 Parallax 99.6 78% 99.8 fps	MRender 93.9 Gravity 92.4 Splatting 90.7 75% 92.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 88%
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 4.56 4% 4.33 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126K SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 128 128 127 129 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.2% Average	Read 238 Write 129 Mixed 154 SusWrite 127 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 23.6 74% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 67.9 DQ Mixed 126 93% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 79%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 451GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 219 214 215 216 218 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.3% Good	Read 239 Write 229 Mixed 206 SusWrite 217 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 33.9 108% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 931GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 134 133 135 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 128 Write 134 Mixed 67 SusWrite 134 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7MFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 58GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.2% Above average	MC Read 27 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 24.3 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.3 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	273x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	253x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16