Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560 659 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 160 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 597 54% 453 Pts	64-Core 777 48% 777 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.31 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126K SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 131 131 131 131 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 233 Write 130 Mixed 155 SusWrite 130 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 23.3 75% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 65.8 DQ Mixed 127 92% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 79%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 451GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 211 216 215 214 215 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.1% Good	Read 234 Write 225 Mixed 204 SusWrite 216 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 32.4 105% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 931GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 135 135 136 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 131 Write 136 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 135 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7MFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 58GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.2% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 25.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	251x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16