PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67 (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130912 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 23 '18 at 13:50 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 61% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 217 222 220 187 126 MB/s
|
67.8%
Good
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
733GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 185 183 193 180 158 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
508GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 105 107 100 92 MB/s
|
59.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $166Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 166x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 115x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 104x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 67x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 52x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $403 |