Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '18 at 09:22
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 94.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 229 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 570 66% 512 Pts	64-Core 572 35% 572 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 110 Parallax 92.4 89% 104 fps	MRender 91.9 Gravity 91.7 Splatting 94 76% 92.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 109 63 60 59 66 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33% Below average	Read 199 Write 114 Mixed 165 SusWrite 94.4 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 13.4 4K Mixed 13.5 53% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 25.2 30% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 930GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 120 120 122 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 118 Write 116 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 119 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB 17,012 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 22.7 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 21.4 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	120x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	68x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	61x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16