MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180427
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '18 at 17:07
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 752 71% 587 Pts	64-Core 1,150 71% 1,150 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 68.9 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 60.9 56% 65.8 fps	MRender 74.4 Gravity 62.3 Splatting 52.5 50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 322 323 324 321 317 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,902 Write 1,526 Mixed 817 SusWrite 375 256% 1,155 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 53 200% 70.6 MB/s	DQ Read 923 DQ Write 741 DQ Mixed 743 580% 802 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 145GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 310 310 310 310 311 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 459 Mixed 394 SusWrite 328 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 58.6 197% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 314 231% 302 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 282GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 108 108 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 116 Write 111 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 108 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 69%
Multi Flash Reader 8GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	6.73% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 14 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 14.1 18% 13 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 51% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.73% Great: 12%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 87GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 39 Write 36 Mixed 28 SusWrite 37.3 47% 35.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 7,253 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 35.4 106% 37.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 39 SC Mixed 29.6 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	31x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	20x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $479

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)