Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101214
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '18 at 08:33
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	69% Good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 89 2-Core 159 70% 114 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 262 34% 258 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 16 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 20.2 13% 21.9 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 14.4 Splatting 33 22% 25.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 173 6133 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10283 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16975 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7317 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 417 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10298 (C2) HDA temperature 109 95 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.8% Average	Read 70.6 Write 78 Mixed 27.9 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.37 99% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722580VLSA80 82GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 12GB free Firmware: V32OA60A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 65537 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 109 109 12896633019 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 19161 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 23223 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 10038 (C0) Power-off retract count 84 84 19280 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 19280 (C2) HDA temperature 141 141 227634249767 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 8 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	22.6% Poor	Read 39.7 Write 38.6 Mixed 21.9 25% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.36 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 32%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 917GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 25.9 Mixed 27.2 36% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.25 71% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 43%
WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 81GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 25.8 Mixed 14.9 29% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.17 56% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 79GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 14 Mixed 16.2 21% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.41 86% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 21%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 14 Mixed 12.6 19% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.24 70% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 13 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	257x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	156x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	142x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	45x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	43x

SSD
AGILITY3 60GBOCZBench 42%, 14,293 samples	23x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	325x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	230x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16