Aftershock P65xHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAftershock P65xHP  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P65xHP
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 06:49
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 600
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 61.2
54% 67 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 69.7
55% 67 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 308 313 302 296 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 457
Mixed 386
SusWrite 316
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 48.2
161% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Zotac SATA SSD 1TB
553GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 118 115 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13% Very poor
Read 128
Write 108
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 118
21% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65xHP Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P65xHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback