Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 644
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 27.9
24% 30.7 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 38.7
30% 37 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 241 182 183 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 451
Mixed 378
SusWrite 221
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.2
196% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 330
251% 339 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
101GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 403 288 248 200 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 456
Mixed 381
SusWrite 296
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 57
197% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
46GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 111 119 130 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 96.2
Write 101
Mixed 26
SusWrite 117
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
215GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 188 189 188 189 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 126
Write 130
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 188
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 15.6
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $691
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback