Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory35.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 12:45
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-6700-$304
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
SC Int 111
SC Float 117
SC Mixed 103
88% 111 Pts
QC Int 398
QC Float 410
QC Mixed 427
93% 412 Pts
MC Int 568
MC Float 645
MC Mixed 618
91% 610 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$176
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Poor: 28% Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$80
32GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 425
Write 42.6
Mixed 76.3
38% 181 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 1.83
65% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 115%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 170
Mixed 130
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 5.21
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 103%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$103
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 88.2
Mixed 77.7
65% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.24
83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
102GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 43.2
Mixed 50.9
35% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.31
85% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$90
102GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 35.4
Write 40.2
Mixed 35.1
28% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.25
57% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 45%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB
450GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance (0th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 105
143% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 59%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB
2GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 8
Mixed 11
14% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.85
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
24% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 40GB
2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 25.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $325Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback