Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory32.3 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '17 at 05:47
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 645
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 30
Parallax 27.2
25% 29.2 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 28
Splatting 28.4
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 425
Write 42.1
Mixed 75.7
38% 181 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 1.86
62% 14 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 136
Write 161
Mixed 112
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 5.35
4K Mixed 0.75
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 92
Mixed 79.3
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.19
87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 55.3
Mixed 54.2
42% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.36
96% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
106GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 44.4
Write 50.2
Mixed 40
34% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.23
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 45%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 138
Write 137
Mixed 92.2
153% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.22
62% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 40GB
2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback