Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory35.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '18 at 12:36
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 225
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 656
64% 528 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.8% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 21.6
23% 25.8 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 28.6
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 427
Write 42.7
Mixed 75.9
39% 182 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 1.8
64% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 138
Write 166
Mixed 126
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.64
200% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 108
Write 90.2
Mixed 84.8
71% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 48.5
Mixed 56.3
39% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.36
98% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
102GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 42.1
Mixed 37.2
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.26
64% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23%
Great: 45%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB
521GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 112
Write 119
Mixed 108
147% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.22
66% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 40GB
2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback