Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory35.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMar 08 '17 at 06:33
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 622
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 21.5
23% 25.7 fps
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 28.5
25% 28.4 fps
Poor: 22% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 390
Mixed 406
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 42.9
161% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 115
101% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 92.9
Mixed 90
70% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.22
90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 67.6
Write 72.4
Mixed 64.5
51% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.38
106% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
120GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 40
Write 36.1
Mixed 37.3
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.2
48% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 45%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 152
Write 147
Mixed 104
168% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.2
64% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 40GB
2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback