Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory35.4 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateApr 12 '18 at 06:31
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 630
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1485 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 23.1
24% 27.4 fps
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 28.5
25% 28.6 fps
Poor: 22% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 424
Write 42.7
Mixed 76.2
38% 181 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 1.82
62% 14 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 120
Write 166
Mixed 119
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.14
4K Mixed 0.81
206% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 91
Write 83.3
Mixed 82.9
64% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 48.7
Mixed 49.7
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
102GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 37.9
Mixed 40.6
29% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.31
64% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 45%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB
467GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 112
Write 120
Mixed 113
150% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.22
63% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBR 40GB
2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback