HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 05:40
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 138
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 234
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
HP(103C 179D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 4.22
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 5.26
4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 73 78 73 78 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 267
Write 104
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 126
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 10
41% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 14.2
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 102%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
3GB free, PID 02a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.4 5.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.1
7% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback