HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory0.7 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 13:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 134
55% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 204
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.38
4% 4.46 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 109 114 120 112 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.8% Below average
Read 174
Write 124
Mixed 146
SusWrite 116
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 16.4
58% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 25.6
24% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback