HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '16 at 19:02
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G6950-$38
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 133
52% 89 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 136
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 048B) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.623
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.16
1% 0.68 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
184GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 94.1
Mixed 30.4
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.45
104% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 70%
T2-60 60GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.095.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4G1 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback