Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 179 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 377 50% 377 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 339A) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 228 227 228 228 228 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.2% Above average	Read 251 Write 229 Mixed 201 SusWrite 227 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 20.2 76% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 119 92% 128 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 232GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 115 116 116 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 128 Write 105 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 117 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-011.A01LF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	420x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	130x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87