bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DZ68ZV
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 10:05
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 92
2-Core 180
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 438
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.6
18% 20 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 17.5
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 77 78 80 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 86.5
Write 87
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 75.6
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
593GB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 105
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
554GB free
Firmware: MK7OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 107
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x3136303020434C313120536572696573 0x8502 0x31383636454C20536572696573 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback