Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E LX (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '18 at 00:48
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 144 58% 97.3 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 242 30% 230 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 60 Reflection 59.5 Parallax 48.8 49% 56.1 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 58.6 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 128 129 157 158 113 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.3% Average	Read 193 Write 179 Mixed 167 SusWrite 130 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 23.7 84% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 87.2 DQ Mixed 42.3 38% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 49GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 43 45 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 130 Write 88.3 Mixed 109 SusWrite 44 21% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 18.2 62% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 54.8 DQ Mixed 28.7 25% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 73%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB 1,117 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 13GB free Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 43 45 46 46 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31% Below average	Read 147 Write 101 Mixed 90 SusWrite 44 21% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 18.3 67% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 26.6 24% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 7GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 188 Write 180 Mixed 166 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 29.6 94% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 39.1 DQ Write 87 DQ Mixed 44.7 39% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	125x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	117x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	189x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	137x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16