Asrock X79 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121122
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '18 at 09:47
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 191 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 594 59% 482 Pts	64-Core 700 43% 700 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 113 Parallax 106 89% 109 fps	MRender 97.1 Gravity 99.3 Splatting 99.7 81% 98.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 284 273 263 259 249 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 464 Write 453 Mixed 393 SusWrite 280 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 34.8 124% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 156 124% 179 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 34GB free Firmware: U21010RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 166 164 164 164 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.9% Average	Read 184 Write 160 Mixed 146 SusWrite 164 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 14.8 67% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 80.2 71% 106 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 86%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 138GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 134 135 133 134 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 346 Write 188 Mixed 215 SusWrite 132 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 24.2 84% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 200 158% 223 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$92 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC98 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 89 91 90 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 123 Write 126 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 89.2 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 75%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 83 87 87 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 81 SusWrite 85.9 134% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 48%
HGST HDN 724030ALE640 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 150GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 156 Write 152 Mixed 30 SusWrite 1.4 100% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 240GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 89.8 Write 94 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 9.8 85% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 58%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 869GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 83 87 87 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 84.5 Write 82 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 85.8 106% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ZEUS-1600 ZEUS-1600 Vulcan-1600 Vulcan-1600 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.1% Very good	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 27.6 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme3

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	43x
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	13x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	7x

SSD
P3-256 256GBBench 69%, 2,367 samples	7x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	5x
Chronos 120GBMushkin $70Bench 68%, 862 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 67%, 1,867 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	5x
M378B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 87%, 109 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359