Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 14:05
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 383
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 66.8
52% 67.1 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 60
Splatting 57.3
52% 64 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 128 130 127 127 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 486
Mixed 370
SusWrite 153
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 60.5
210% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 145
140% 214 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
99GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 150 102 108 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 350
Write 242
Mixed 164
SusWrite 139
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 15.8
96% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 24.4
46% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
202GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 85.3
Write 14
Mixed 46
SusWrite 98
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
577GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 105 117 117 115 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 126
Write 115
Mixed 110
SusWrite 113
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
559GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 92 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 93
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 90.9
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 167 167 164 162 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 127
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 164
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 105%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-60HXZT1 500GB
167GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 45.3
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 64.6
61% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback