ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 429143M

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 429143M (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 429143M
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '18 at 11:15
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 85.5 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 122 61% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.65 Parallax 1.66 2% 2.58 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.57 3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GMCS 128GB 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSTAN103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 108 72 72 67 61 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.7% Average	Read 223 Write 197 Mixed 206 SusWrite 88.7 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 19.8 61% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 170 132% 180 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 84%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 930GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 133 132 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 125 Write 131 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 133 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback