QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 12:33
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$275
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 609
65% 520 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.7% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 56.9
46% 60 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 52.6
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 133 115 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 344
Write 329
Mixed 320
SusWrite 153
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 32.3
107% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 288
234% 331 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 86%
Red Hat VirtIO 2.5TB
306GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 153 159 156 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 140
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 154
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
337GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 91 95 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 93.4
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback