QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '18 at 12:33
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$530 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 216 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 609 65% 520 Pts	64-Core 830 51% 830 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.7% Average	Lighting 56.8 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 56.9 46% 60 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 54.1 Splatting 52.6 48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 133 115 110 111 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 344 Write 329 Mixed 320 SusWrite 153 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 32.3 107% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 288 234% 331 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 86%
Red Hat VirtIO 2.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 306GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 153 159 156 152 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.1% Excellent	Read 148 Write 140 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 154 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 182% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 337GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 91 95 94 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 85.2 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 93.4 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 27.7 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.1 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	31x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	16x
Ryzen 9 5900X 12-CoreAMDBench 92%, 160 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $325Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $419Bench 129%, 353,966 samples	22x
GTX 1080Nvidia $323Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	21x

SSD
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	17x
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 67%, 18 samples	16x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 260%, 140,876 samples	12x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	103x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	56x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $419	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16