QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 12:33
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3930K-$499
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
SC Int 107
SC Float 107
SC Mixed 108
86% 108 Pts
QC Int 431
QC Float 431
QC Mixed 430
98% 430 Pts
MC Int 801
MC Float 830
MC Mixed 834
123% 822 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$260
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 170
Reflection 172
Parallax 182
54% 175 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 162
Splatting 121
62% 144 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 133 115 110 111 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
Read 344
Write 329
Mixed 320
SusWrite 153
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 32.3
107% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 288
234% 331 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 86%
Red Hat VirtIO 2.5TB
306GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 153 159 156 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 140
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 154
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
337GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 91 95 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 93.4
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 123%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $320Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback