QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '18 at 10:29
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$485 31,852 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 618 67% 520 Pts	64-Core 811 54% 811 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340 656,857 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.1% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 57.3 46% 60.3 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 54.1 Splatting 52.1 46% 59.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 282 290 169 113 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 346 Write 333 Mixed 315 SusWrite 219 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 31 104% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 269 225% 326 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 86%
Red Hat VirtIO 2.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 306GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 151 159 156 152 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	86.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 149 Mixed 66 SusWrite 154 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.7 187% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 337GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 96 98 97 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 94.5 Mixed 73 SusWrite 96.6 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 2,018 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 27.2 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900X 12-CoreAMDBench 78%, 314 samples	67x
EPYC (with IBPB)AMDBench 70%, 426 samples	47x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 73%, 242 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $450Bench 105%, 788,376 samples	54x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,090,662 samples	41x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $808Bench 136%, 606,069 samples	41x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $70Bench 273%, 325,610 samples	17x
Hat VirtIO 120GBRedBench 50%, 34 samples	17x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 56%, 50 samples	17x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 83%, 2,018 samples	199x
1x8GBQEMUBench 69%, 3,371 samples	85x
1x12GBQEMUBench 75%, 3,299 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $224	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-10400F $148	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)