QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '18 at 10:29
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Core i7-3930K-$500 13,826 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	SC Int 105 SC Float 108 SC Mixed 107 85% 106 Pts	QC Int 429 QC Float 435 QC Mixed 422 97% 429 Pts	MC Int 798 MC Float 798 MC Mixed 811 120% 802 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$374 383,532 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Lighting 172 Reflection 172 Parallax 184 54% 176 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 162 Splatting 120 62% 144 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 140GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 282 290 169 113 111 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.2% Very good	Read 346 Write 333 Mixed 315 SusWrite 219 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 31 104% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 269 225% 326 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 86%
Red Hat VirtIO 2.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 306GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 151 159 156 152 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	86.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 149 Mixed 66 SusWrite 154 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.7 187% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 337GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 96 98 97 96 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 94.5 Mixed 73 SusWrite 96.6 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 363 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 27.2 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 71%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-CoreAMDBench 98%, 15 samples	11x
Core (Skylake, IBRS)IntelBench 73%, 40 samples	10x
Core (Skylake, IBRS)IntelBench 84%, 16 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $374Bench 64%, 383,532 samples	42x
GTX 1070Nvidia $280Bench 99%, 466,205 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $240Bench 71%, 464,970 samples	15x

SSD
HARDDISK 250GBQemuBench 54%, 15 samples	11x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $168Bench 338%, 13,286 samples	8x
Hat VirtIO 250GBRedBench 61%, 14 samples	7x

RAM
1x8GBQEMUBench 65%, 925 samples	63x
1x16GBQEMUBench 74%, 363 samples	25x
1x12GBQEMUBench 79%, 261 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $374

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365	Nvidia GTX 1070 $280	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $159	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $260	Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $124	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $800	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $133	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12