Acer Aspire 5750G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 5750G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 04 '14 at 21:34
Run Duration1183 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 115
43% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
304GB free
Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 78.8
Write 73.2
Mixed 68
55% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.12
54% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 48%
WD Elements 1TB
586GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 96.6
Write 77.8
Mixed 61.2
96% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.24
79% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB
169GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 22.7
Mixed 24.4
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.37
81% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 44%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
3GB free, PID fa05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 11.3
Mixed 13.3
18% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.71
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
12% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 9%
LEXAR JD FIREFLY 4GB
3GB free, PID a701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 4.16
Mixed 6.81
10% 9.88 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
22% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 7%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 3.98
Mixed 6.03
9% 9.14 MB/s
4K Read 4.41
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.007
17% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 8%
TS2GJFV10 2GB
2GB free, PID 0163
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.26% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 2.11
Mixed 3.52
6% 5.84 MB/s
4K Read 4.26
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
17% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 4%
Kingston DataTraveler G2 4GB
2GB free, PID 1624
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 5.53
Mixed 8.19
12% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.14
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
16% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 7%
Typical Aspire 5750G Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback