Asus P5Q-WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-WS  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 08:01
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Memory 1.86
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 53.3
13% 27.3 Pts
4-Core 53.2
8-Core 53.3
7% 53.2 Pts
64-Core 54.7
3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 11.3
11% 13.8 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 14.8
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 205 229 243 241 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71% Very good
Read 190
Write 225
Mixed 235
SusWrite 222
50% 218 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 40.2
133% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 191
141% 187 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71%
Great: 126%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 4.7 7.6 5.9 6.7 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 5.6
5% 3.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 16%
USB3.0 high speed 256GB
233GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.5 8.8 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 13
Write 9.4
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 12.4
17% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.5
113% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 170%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.1 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 3.8
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 6.4
6% 4.78 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 487
8% 487 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-WS Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback