Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55-UD4  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '18 at 18:00
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 148
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 369
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 850E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 48.6
41% 51.1 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 46
41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 125 125 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 155
Write 134
Mixed 135
SusWrite 124
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 33.7
105% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 28.2
44% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 52%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
15GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 57 55 49 49 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 75.7
Write 67.3
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 51.5
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 65%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
501GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 77
Write 45.3
Mixed 47
SusWrite 38.7
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 63%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 119 115 119 120 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 108
Write 44.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 115
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.9
261% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 2TB
30GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 27
Write 16.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 11.9
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 15.5
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 12
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55-UD4 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback