Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55-UD4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '18 at 12:20
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 167
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 418
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 850E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 58.4
49% 61.4 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 55.4
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 101 114 107 108 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.6% Good
Read 256
Write 243
Mixed 218
SusWrite 108
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 36.5
125% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 41
63% 116 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
15GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 61 58 58 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 89.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 67
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 65%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
501GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 55 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 97
Write 81.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 56.2
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 63%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 160 153 166 164 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 138
Write 50
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 151
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.2
317% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 2TB
30GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 25.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 19.3
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28.7
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 19.6
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55-UD4 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback