Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '18 at 07:22
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 67%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 108
48% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 167
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 43.2
33% 38.4 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 37.6
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Disk 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q062
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 33 37 145 165 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 408
Write 343
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 111
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 18.3
63% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 1.2
46% 109 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
805GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 19 25 20 46 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 9.9
Write 28.4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 31.1
14% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 59%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
160GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 14 16 18 28 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 11.7
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 20.8
20% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 14
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback