MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B12
MotherboardMSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 17:15
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 285
100% 180 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 921
94% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,280
79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 307 305 304 309 309 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,455
Write 1,457
Mixed 994
SusWrite 360
290% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 85.4
306% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 1,419
DQ Mixed 994
807% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 268%
Great: 280%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
25GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 129 129 129 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 471
Write 134
Mixed 132
SusWrite 129
47% 217 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 20.3
124% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 50.1
84% 169 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CV26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 183 179 184 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 176
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 182
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 136 138 131 140 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78% Very good
Read 134
Write 139
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 138
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78%
Great: 108%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
45GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 71.7
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52%
Great: 82%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
302GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 29.2
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 30.3
38% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 25.5
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 29.2
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) Builds (Compare 3,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback