MSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING R6 SIEGE (MS-7A11)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A11
MotherboardMSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING R6 SIEGE (MS-7A11)  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 21:55
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 514
68% 513 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 1368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 66.5
58% 70.7 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 61.2
55% 68 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,032
Write 9,381
Mixed 8,817
2,100% 9,410 MB/s
4K Read 1,163
4K Write 659
4K Mixed 219
2,392% 680 MB/s
DQ Read 2,588
DQ Write 1,783
DQ Mixed 2,210
1,643% 2,194 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
904GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 120 120 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 119
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
465GB free
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 70.5
Write 52.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 74.5
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 2038
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.2
7% 6.2 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 33.2
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 29.8
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A KRAIT GAMING R6 SIEGE (MS-7A11) Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING R6 SIEGE (MS-7A11)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback