Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 01:27
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 106
49% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 288
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3100) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 18.6
18% 18.6 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 19.7
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 84 86 90 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 81.3
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 83.1
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
509GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 108 109 106 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 107
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63%
Great: 65%
Memorex TD Classic 003C 1GB
1GB free, PID 0008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Read 9
Write 1.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.9
4% 3.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2000EL Series 2000EL Series 2000EL Series 2000EL Series 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback