MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 17 '17 at 01:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 467
51% 403 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
PNY(196E 109A) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 352.86
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 9.41
7% 8.98 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 8.63
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 113
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.21
97% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
792GB free
Firmware: 05.0
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 153
Write 101
Mixed 112
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.46
139% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2000EL Series 2000EL Series 2000EL Series 2000EL Series 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-GD65 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback