Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJun 27 '18 at 23:37
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 505
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.7% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 50.9
46% 55.5 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 47.5
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 260 287 290 287 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 366
Write 293
Mixed 228
SusWrite 268
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 31.3
124% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 243
204% 296 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 129%
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
35GB free
Firmware: 07TA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 204 208 211 195 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 367
Write 227
Mixed 237
SusWrite 192
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 13.7
83% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 23.9
42% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 69%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
70GB free
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 84 51 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62% Good
Read 433
Write 385
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 80.5
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 33.8
102% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 53.5
DQ Mixed 93.1
88% 144 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62%
Great: 91%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
2GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 13 19 6.1 26 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 294
Write 33.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 17.5
19% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
30% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
466GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 150
Write 109
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 104
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 128 130 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 130
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 129
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 84%
Seagate BUP Slim 240GB
41GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 90 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 22%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
39GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 52 32 31 32 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 135
Write 98
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 43.3
116% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.9
214% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D3-2400-MR 0821 16G-D3-2400-MR 0921 16G-D3-2400-MR 0821 16G-D3-2400-MR 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback