Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2686 v3 32 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 84.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 740 70% 580 Pts	64-Core 2,174 135% 2,174 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1563 MHz, MLim: 1818 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (85 fps cap detected)	67.8% Good	Lighting 86.2 Reflection 84.8 Parallax 84.4 70% 85.1 fps	MRender 85.2 Gravity 79.7 Splatting 69.4 63% 78.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7442 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 519 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 47 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 95 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29589466922	54.6% Above average	Read 398 Write 378 Mixed 362 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 5.02 4K Mixed 1.14 58% 14 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FB 2x16GB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2468 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.3% Good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 21.3 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	22x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $410