Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 03:32
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2686 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 126
56% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 506
45% 380 Pts
64-Core 1,505
93% 1,505 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 74
62% 75.4 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 71.9
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,582
Write 1,251
Mixed 1,407
384% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 27.8
97% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 118
128% 216 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 221%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
174GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 409
Mixed 422
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 40.3
140% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 119
123% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 134%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
288GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 89.9
Write 75.3
Mixed 94.2
66% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.21
82% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$44
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback