Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 23:05
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$94 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 212 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 402 54% 402 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 41.5 32% 37.5 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT04L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2724 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 560 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 92 92 86 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (E9) Unknown 199 199 4370812 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 47 (EC) Unknown 99 99 28 (ED) Unknown 99 99 86 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	59.8% Above average	Read 496 Write 243 Mixed 214 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 9.53 81% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 8.94 18% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 80%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 107GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 135 4141 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3228 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9110 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2903 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 93 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 133 133 203861 (C2) HDA temperature 102 91 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.7% Average	Read 70.4 Write 70.9 Mixed 71 53% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.25 86% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 85%
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB 1,496 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 87GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 651 (03) Spinup time 115 111 7233 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10449 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17493 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6701 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1068 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 145 145 166196 (C2) HDA temperature 106 91 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 193 193 824 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 194 194 685 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 113 (C8) Write error rate 195 195 897	49.8% Average	Read 87.1 Write 86.3 Mixed 79.5 63% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.3 84% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 47,473 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.8 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 14.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	474x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	422x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	204x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	195x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $741

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16