HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z200 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory5.9 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100408
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 08 '18 at 14:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 151
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 282
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.59
3% 4.02 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
431GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 112
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 108
Write 123
Mixed 96.6
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.54
106% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback