HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory4.2 GB free of 6.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '16 at 04:37
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5504
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 101
40% 67 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 404
36% 303 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 2056) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 9.97
10% 11.8 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 15.9
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 320GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 216
Mixed 194
153% 203 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.56
4K Mixed 0.52
172% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 119%
Great: 131%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
359GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 23.7
Mixed 9.14
23% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.22
47% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback