HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory4.2 GB free of 6.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 16:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 156
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 524
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 380
Nvidia(10DE 063B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 0.34
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.13
2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 227 225 224 222 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.4% Above average
Read 229
Write 217
Mixed 206
SusWrite 226
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 18.2
73% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 34.4
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
466GB free
Firmware: 03.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 118
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 23.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback