Notebook P95xER

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 63% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Notebook P95xER (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P95xER
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	May 29 '18 at 12:54
Run Duration	96 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	63%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 44.4 2-Core 89 44% 68.1 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 293 29% 235 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 95E1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.51% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 6.84 6% 8.38 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 13.5 8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.51% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 14 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 20 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 51 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 837042722	73% Very good	Read 503 Write 391 Mixed 414 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 21.8 84% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 93.4 DQ Write 53.4 DQ Mixed 32.2 35% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FH 2x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 19.8 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 99.3 40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P95xER Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Notebook P95xER

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	99x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 61%, 9,069 samples	44x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	44x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	10x

SSD
Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GBWD $55Bench 85%, 9,409 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	8x
XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdata $88Bench 123%, 2,661 samples	8x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	11x
GKE160SO102408-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 46%, 1,111 samples	8x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GBKingstonBench 80%, 5,417 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $55

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16