Cyberpowerpc Tracer II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc Tracer II  (all builds)
MotherboardCyberpowerPC TRACER II
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '18 at 23:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 594
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1035) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 119
Parallax 90.5
78% 102 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 103
80% 97 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
223GB free
Firmware: UF300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 479
Write 198
Mixed 223
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 3.42
49% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 4.37
22% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ190000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 477
Write 78.2
Mixed 196
54% 251 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 3.27
43% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 46.9
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 3.28
10% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01D4S88GB1G81G82400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Tracer II Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Cyberpowerpc Tracer II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback