Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '18 at 20:16
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 266
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 482
65% 483 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 76.8
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 66.3
63% 73.5 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 70
Splatting 73.3
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 404
Mixed 413
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 40.7
138% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 104
132% 238 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
113GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 404
Mixed 419
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 46.3
140% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 117
139% 245 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
68GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 482
Write 340
Mixed 337
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 20.5
104% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 67.2
109% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
903GB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 127
Mixed 112
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.21
71% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
648GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 132
Write 129
Mixed 68.1
135% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.21
44% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 21.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $871
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $35SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback