Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime19.3 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 22:26
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 515
69% 514 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 65.7
61% 72.4 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 71.6
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 277 270 277 257 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 450
Mixed 382
SusWrite 268
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 39.7
153% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
118GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 464 462 446 431 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 438
Mixed 357
SusWrite 423
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 60.6
202% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
68GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 141 142 143 141 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 446
Mixed 377
SusWrite 168
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48
179% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 179
184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
883GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 139 140 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 137
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 138
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
477GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 161 164 166 162 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 68.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 161
134% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $871
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback