Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime19.5 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 01:16
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 535
72% 536 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 77.3
Reflection 78
Parallax 67.8
63% 74.4 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 73.2
59% 72 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 285 286 287 288 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 450
Mixed 362
SusWrite 287
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 57.9
193% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
118GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 474 474 452 446 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 448
Mixed 389
SusWrite 437
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 60.5
201% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
68GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 143 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 452
Mixed 383
SusWrite 168
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48.4
177% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 177
184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
883GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 117 119 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65% Good
Read 110
Write 114
Mixed 69
SusWrite 117
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
477GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 164 164 165 164 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 63
SusWrite 160
134% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback