Asus H110M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-C  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 19 '18 at 18:25
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 415
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB; nvidia gforce gtx 1060 3gb
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 58.5
58% 65.7 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 69
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 480
Write 230
Mixed 239
69% 316 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 9.29
87% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 49.3
DQ Mixed 10.8
17% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
459GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 155
Mixed 155
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.25
88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.1% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback