Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '14 at 09:58
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3420-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 184
63% 139 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 179
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 41% Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Palit(1569 1284) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4465
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 7.84
6% 7.36 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 7.13
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 128GB-$106
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 464
Write 312
Mixed 373
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 31
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 71.9
120% 234 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
696GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 159
Write 134
Mixed 133
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.31
82% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84%
Great: 112%
OCZ ATV 8GB
2GB free, PID ac02
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Read 33
Write 10.2
Mixed 15.5
21% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.59
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
38% 3.21 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 9%
Typical GA-B85M-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3 - $152

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback