| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 14.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160211 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 30 '18 at 02:54 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3 530-$45
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
45.2%
Average
|
47% 76.5 Pts
|
20% 150 Pts
|
10% 158 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 170B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
|
0.86%
Terrible
|
1% 1.01 fps
|
1% 1.31 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung RBX Series 64GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PS105D15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
14% 65.3 MB/s
|
32% 7.83 MB/s
| |
|
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.2%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
14% 5 GB/s
|
34% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z200 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |