Lenovo 10FCCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 10FCCTO1WW (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 30BC
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '18 at 14:51
Run Duration	460 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 101 2-Core 205 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 337 52% 378 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 30BC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 5.72 5% 7.06 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5.47 Splatting 13.2 7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC62 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 34493040 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 696 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 146724564 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2754 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 696 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 59 656867367 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11748 (C2) HDA temperature 39 41 64424509479 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -107361297495377 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13484347295 (F2) Unknown 100 253 75307008592	73.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 131 Mixed 138 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.16 53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 114%
Kingston DT Guitar 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	5.65% Terrible	Read 27.1 Write 4.14 Mixed 5.08 11% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.46 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0.001 13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.65% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 12.1 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 10FCCTO1WW

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)